Sign In | Join Free | My esadidasol.com |
|
Model Number : Measurement Uncertainty in Weighing Systems
Place of Origin : CHINA
MOQ : 1 set
Price : Negotiation
Supply Ability : 2000 set per month
Delivery Time : 10-30days
Packaging Details : Caron box
Product : Measurement Uncertainty in Weighing Systems
Readability : 0.1μg to 1kg
Repeatability : ±0.01% to ±0.5% of load
Nonlinearity : ±0.02% to ±0.2% FS
Hysteresis : ±0.01% to ±0.1% FS
Temperature Coefficient : 0.0001% to 0.01%/°C
Air Buoyancy : Up to 0.1% error
Vibration Sensitivity : 0.001% to 0.1% disturbance
Draft Effects : 0.01% to 1% variation
Minimum Weight : 20-100×readability
Settling Time : 2-30 seconds
Eccentric Loading : 0.01% to 0.5% error
Calibration Interval : Daily to annually
Weight Class : E0 to M3
Stability : ±0.5ppm to ±300ppm/year
Magnetic Properties : <0.01% influence
Sample Size : 1-1000 measurements
Weighing Mode : Static/Dynamic
Tare Uncertainty : ±0.1% to ±2%
Measurement Uncertainty in Weighing Systems: Principles and Best Practices for Metrological Accuracy
Measurement uncertainty is a fundamental concept in metrology that quantifies the doubt associated with weighing results. In precision weighing systems, understanding and managing uncertainty is critical for:
Ensuring compliance with international standards (ISO/IEC 17025, OIML R76)
Maintaining quality control in regulated industries
Making reliable pass/fail decisions in checkweighing applications
Validating weighing processes for GMP and FDA compliance
Perform regular calibrations using traceable mass standards (Class E2 or better)
Implement daily verification checks with control weights
Maintain environmental logs (temperature, humidity, barometric pressure)
Follow manufacturer's preventive maintenance schedule
Allow proper warm-up time (typically 30-60 minutes for analytical balances)
Use anti-static devices for powders and light materials
Implement proper leveling procedures
Establish standard operating procedures (SOPs) for weighing processes
Automated weighing systems to eliminate operator influence
Statistical process control (SPC) for trend monitoring
Monte Carlo simulations for complex uncertainty analysis
Digital filtering algorithms to reduce electronic noise
Effective measurement uncertainty management in weighing systems requires:
Comprehensive understanding of all uncertainty sources
Proper system selection matched to application requirements
Rigorous calibration and maintenance programs
Operator training and standardized procedures
Continuous monitoring and improvement processes
By implementing these best practices, organizations can achieve metrological accuracy that meets both
technical requirements and regulatory expectations while optimizing quality control processes.
Specifications:
Parameter | Standard Model |
---|---|
Readability | 0.1μg to 1kg |
Repeatability | ±0.01% to ±0.5% of load |
Nonlinearity | ±0.02% to ±0.2% FS |
Hysteresis | ±0.01% to ±0.1% FS |
Temperature Coefficient | 0.0001% to 0.01%/°C |
Air Buoyancy | Up to 0.1% error |
Vibration Sensitivity | 0.001% to 0.1% disturbance |
Draft Effects | 0.01% to 1% variation |
Minimum Weight | 20-100×readability |
![]() |
Measurement Uncertainty in Weighing Systems: Principles and Best Practices for Metrological Accuracy Images |